Semiparametric estimation of the dependence parameter of the error terms in multivariate regression

A semiparametric method is developed for estimating the dependence parameter and the joint distribution of the error term in the multivariate linear regression model. The nonparametric part of the method treats the marginal distributions of the error term as unknown, and estimates them by suitable empirical distribution functions. Then a pseudolikelihood is maximized to estimate the dependence parameter. It is shown that this estimator is asymptotically normal, and a consistent estimator of its large sample variance is given. A simulation study shows that the proposed semiparametric estimator is better than the parametric methods available when the error distribution is unknown, which is almost always the case in practice. It turns out that there is no loss of asymptotic efficiency due to the estimation of the regression parameters. An empirical example on portfolio management is used to illustrate the method. This is an extension of earlier work by Oakes (1994) and Genest et al. (1995) for the case when the observations are independent and identically distributed, and Oakes and Ritz (2000) for the multivariate regression model.Copula; Pseudo-likelihood; Robustness.

Robustness of a semiparametric estimator of a copula

Copulas offer a convenient way of modelling multivariate observations and capturing the intrinsic dependence between the components of a multivariate random variable. A semiparametric method for estimating the dependence parameters of copulas was proposed by Genest, Ghoudi and Rivest (1995), in which the marginal distributions are estimated nonparameterically by empirical distribution functions. Thus, this method does not require any marginal distribution to have a known parametric form. However, a standard concern about semiparametric methods is the possibility that it may be substantially less efficient than the parametric method when the model is completely parametric and correctly specified. In this paper we investigate the efficiency-robustness properties of the foregoing semiparametric method by simulation; in particular, we evaluate the performance of this method when the marginal distributions are specified correctly and when they are specified incorrectly. The results show that the semiparametric method is better than the parametric methods. An example involving the household expenditure data for Australia is used to compare and contrast the methodsCopulas; multivariate joint distribution; inference function method;maximum likelihood mathod;semiparametric method

Semiparametric estimation of duration models when the parameters are subject to inequality constraints and the error distribution is unknown

This paper proposes a semiparametric method for estimating duration models when there are inequality constraints on some parameters and the error distribution may be unknown. Thus, the setting considered here is particularly suitable for practical applications. The parameters in duration models are usually estimated by a quasi-MLE. Recent advances show that a semiparametrically efficient estimator [SPE] has better asymptotic optimality properties than the QMLE provided that the parameter space is unrestricted. However, in several important duration models, the parameter space is restricted, for example in the commonly used linear duration model some parameters are non-negative. In such cases, the SPE may turn out to be outside the allowed parameter space and hence are unsuitable for use. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a new constrained semiparametric estimator. In a simulation study involving duration models with inequality constraints on parameters, the new estimator proposed in this paper performed better than its competitors. An empirical example is provided to illustrate the application of the new constrained semiparametric estimator and to show how it overcomes difficulties encountered when the unconstrained estimator of nonnegative parameters turn out to be negative.Adaptive inference; Conditional duration model; Constrained inference; Efficient semiparametric estimation; Order restricted inference; Semiparametric efficiency bound.

Pranab Kumar Sen: Life and works

In this article, we describe briefly the highlights and various accomplishments in the personal as well as the academic life of Professor Pranab Kumar Sen.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/193940307000000013 the IMS Collections (http://www.imstat.org/publications/imscollections.htm) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Semiparametric estimation of duration models when the parameters are subject to inequality constraints and the error distribution is unknown

The parameters in duration models are usually estimated by a Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimator [QMLE]. This estimator is efficient if the errors are iid and exponentially distributed. Otherwise, it may not be the most efficient. Motivated by this, a class of estimators has been introduced by Drost and Werker (2004). Their estimator is asymptotically most efficient when the error distribution is unknown. However, the practical relevance of their method remains to be evaluated. Further, although some parameters in several common duration models are known to be nonnegative, this estimator may turn out to be negative. This paper addresses these two issues. We propose a new semiparametric estimator when there are inequality constraints on parameters, and a simulation study evaluates the two semiparametric estimators. The results lead us to conclude the following when the error distribution is unknown: (i) If there are no inequality constraints on parameters then the Drost-Werker estimator is better than the QMLE, and (ii) if there are inequality constraints on parameters then the estimator proposed in this paper is better than the Drost-Werker estimator and the QMLE. In conclusion, this paper recommends estimators that are better than the often used QMLE for estimating duration models

UU-tests for variance components in one-way random effects models

We consider a test for the hypothesis that the within-treatment variance component in a one-way random effects model is null. This test is based on a decomposition of a $U$-statistic. Its asymptotic null distribution is derived under the mild regularity condition that the second moment of the random effects and the fourth moment of the within-treatment errors are finite. Under the additional assumption that the fourth moment of the random effect is finite, we also derive the distribution of the proposed $U$-test statistic under a sequence of local alternative hypotheses. We report the results of a simulation study conducted to compare the performance of the $U$-test with that of the usual $F$-test. The main conclusions of the simulation study are that (i) under normality or under moderate degrees of imbalance in the design, the $F$-test behaves well when compared to the $U$-test, and (ii) when the distribution of the random effects and within-treatment errors are nonnormal, the $U$-test is preferable even when the number of treatments is small.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/193940307000000149 the IMS Collections (http://www.imstat.org/publications/imscollections.htm) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org